<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1370 - GSTAT PRAYAGRAJ</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801427</link>
    <description>Rule 138 requires an e-way bill for movement of goods above the prescribed consignment value, including internal stock transfers undertaken otherwise than by way of supply. A delivery challan under Rule 55 does not replace that requirement, and distance-based relaxations do not generally exempt e-way bill generation. However, transfer of tax-paid goods between a taxpayer&#039;s own godown and showroom, without consideration or another person, is not a taxable supply and creates no tax liability. A procedural e-way bill lapse cannot sustain a Section 129 penalty where no tax is payable and the facts do not establish deliberate tax evasion or clandestine removal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1370 - GSTAT PRAYAGRAJ</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801427</link>
      <description>Rule 138 requires an e-way bill for movement of goods above the prescribed consignment value, including internal stock transfers undertaken otherwise than by way of supply. A delivery challan under Rule 55 does not replace that requirement, and distance-based relaxations do not generally exempt e-way bill generation. However, transfer of tax-paid goods between a taxpayer&#039;s own godown and showroom, without consideration or another person, is not a taxable supply and creates no tax liability. A procedural e-way bill lapse cannot sustain a Section 129 penalty where no tax is payable and the facts do not establish deliberate tax evasion or clandestine removal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801427</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>