<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801431</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction over pending inspection and search proceedings was not exercised before issuance of a show-cause notice or final liability determination. Disputes over independent witnesses, the panchnama, and the voluntariness of tax payment required assessment of contemporaneous material by the competent authority. The writ petition was dismissed at that preliminary stage without deciding the merits, and all contentions remained open in statutory adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1374 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801431</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction over pending inspection and search proceedings was not exercised before issuance of a show-cause notice or final liability determination. Disputes over independent witnesses, the panchnama, and the voluntariness of tax payment required assessment of contemporaneous material by the competent authority. The writ petition was dismissed at that preliminary stage without deciding the merits, and all contentions remained open in statutory adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801431</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>