<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>E-way bill obligations cover internal stock transfers, but penalties fail where bona fide error negates tax-evasion intent.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105241</link>
    <description>E-way bill rules require an e-way bill for internal stock transfers exceeding the prescribed value, even where goods move under a delivery challan otherwise than by supply; the challan does not replace that obligation. Transfer of tax-paid goods between a dealer&#039;s own premises, without another person or consideration, does not constitute supply and attracts no tax. Although failure to carry an e-way bill was a technical procedural breach, penalty under Section 129 was unsustainable because the goods were traceable and a bona fide misunderstanding of distance-based rules negated intent to evade tax. The penalty and related orders were set aside, with refund of the deposited penalty plus applicable interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930870" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>E-way bill obligations cover internal stock transfers, but penalties fail where bona fide error negates tax-evasion intent.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105241</link>
      <description>E-way bill rules require an e-way bill for internal stock transfers exceeding the prescribed value, even where goods move under a delivery challan otherwise than by supply; the challan does not replace that obligation. Transfer of tax-paid goods between a dealer&#039;s own premises, without another person or consideration, does not constitute supply and attracts no tax. Although failure to carry an e-way bill was a technical procedural breach, penalty under Section 129 was unsustainable because the goods were traceable and a bona fide misunderstanding of distance-based rules negated intent to evade tax. The penalty and related orders were set aside, with refund of the deposited penalty plus applicable interest.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105241</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>