https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105206 Government departments remain equally bound by limitation requirements in Customs Act appeals. Vague assertions that earlier counsel caused delay do not establish sufficient cause where the department cannot explain file transfer, follow-up, retrieval, or inconsistencies over documents allegedly supplied. Administrative inaction, lethargic internal functioning, and an unsubstantiated effort to attribute delay wholly to counsel cannot justify condonation. In the absence of a reasonable explanation, the delay-condonation application was dismissed and the Customs Act appeal stood disposed of. en-us Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530 Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:58 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105206 Government departments remain equally bound by limitation requirements in Customs Act appeals. Vague assertions that earlier counsel caused delay do not establish sufficient cause where the department cannot explain file transfer, follow-up, retrieval, or inconsistencies over documents allegedly supplied. Administrative inaction, lethargic internal functioning, and an unsubstantiated effort to attribute delay wholly to counsel cannot justify condonation. In the absence of a reasonable explanation, the delay-condonation application was dismissed and the Customs Act appeal stood disposed of. Highlights Customs Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105206