<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Reasoned FEMA penalty orders must disclose evidence supporting liability; an unexplained affirmance requires fresh adjudication.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105199</link>
    <description>Reasoned adjudicatory orders imposing or affirming FEMA penalties must disclose the evidence and reasons supporting liability. Where the Tribunal accepted the company&#039;s explanation for seized Indian and foreign currency, it had to address any further evidence justifying penalties against the appellant; reasons could not be inferred merely from factual narration. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order because it did not reveal the basis for affirming the penalties, and remanded the appeal for fresh, reasoned adjudication uninfluenced by earlier observations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930828" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Reasoned FEMA penalty orders must disclose evidence supporting liability; an unexplained affirmance requires fresh adjudication.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105199</link>
      <description>Reasoned adjudicatory orders imposing or affirming FEMA penalties must disclose the evidence and reasons supporting liability. Where the Tribunal accepted the company&#039;s explanation for seized Indian and foreign currency, it had to address any further evidence justifying penalties against the appellant; reasons could not be inferred merely from factual narration. The High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order because it did not reveal the basis for affirming the penalties, and remanded the appeal for fresh, reasoned adjudication uninfluenced by earlier observations.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2026 08:37:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105199</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>