https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54605 On comparison of signatures, the Tribunal found a prima facie case that the earlier appeal and stay application were not signed by the person appearing before it. The verification in those papers was treated as false, and the appeal memo and stay application were viewed as fabricated in the name of the stated proprietor. As the conduct disclosed apparent offences of false evidence, forgery, use of forged documents as genuine, and criminal conspiracy, the Tribunal directed the Registrar to lodge a complaint and preserve the record for investigation. en-us Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54605 On comparison of signatures, the Tribunal found a prima facie case that the earlier appeal and stay application were not signed by the person appearing before it. The verification in those papers was treated as false, and the appeal memo and stay application were viewed as fabricated in the name of the stated proprietor. As the conduct disclosed apparent offences of false evidence, forgery, use of forged documents as genuine, and criminal conspiracy, the Tribunal directed the Registrar to lodge a complaint and preserve the record for investigation. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 19 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54605