<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1931 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472650</link>
    <description>Foreign investment received as a marriage gift was not undisclosed foreign income or an undisclosed foreign asset under the Black Money Act where it had been recorded in annual accounts and explained during assessment. A gift deed and donor confirmation merely corroborated the already disclosed source of the investment and did not constitute impermissible additional evidence. The documented source stood explained, and deletion of the addition was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 19:03:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930794" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1931 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472650</link>
      <description>Foreign investment received as a marriage gift was not undisclosed foreign income or an undisclosed foreign asset under the Black Money Act where it had been recorded in annual accounts and explained during assessment. A gift deed and donor confirmation merely corroborated the already disclosed source of the investment and did not constitute impermissible additional evidence. The documented source stood explained, and deletion of the addition was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>