<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Will-based benami claims remain barred where pleadings assert beneficial ownership and no statutory fiduciary relationship exists.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105188</link>
    <description>Will-based claims for property remain benami claims where pleadings allege that the claimant funded acquisition in another&#039;s name and the property was held for the claimant&#039;s present or future benefit. Such beneficial-owner claims are barred from civil enforcement, and a later Will or proposed re-transfer cannot independently validate restoration of the property. The fiduciary-capacity exception requires a legally recognised property-related fiduciary duty; employment, personal confidence, loyalty, or commercial arrangements alone are insufficient. Courts may reject a plaint at the threshold where its own averments disclose the statutory elements of benami and no legally sustainable exception, while genuine fact-dependent fiduciary disputes.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:51:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:51:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930779" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Will-based benami claims remain barred where pleadings assert beneficial ownership and no statutory fiduciary relationship exists.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105188</link>
      <description>Will-based claims for property remain benami claims where pleadings allege that the claimant funded acquisition in another&#039;s name and the property was held for the claimant&#039;s present or future benefit. Such beneficial-owner claims are barred from civil enforcement, and a later Will or proposed re-transfer cannot independently validate restoration of the property. The fiduciary-capacity exception requires a legally recognised property-related fiduciary duty; employment, personal confidence, loyalty, or commercial arrangements alone are insufficient. Courts may reject a plaint at the threshold where its own averments disclose the statutory elements of benami and no legally sustainable exception, while genuine fact-dependent fiduciary disputes.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Benami Property</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 18:51:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105188</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>