<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (4) TMI 1495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472632</link>
    <description>Non-adjudication of a ground challenging partial disallowance of business expenses, despite its inclusion in Form No. 36, constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. A discrepancy between the serial numbering in Form No. 36 and separately annexed grounds does not negate that the ground was duly raised. Rectification is therefore available through limited recall confined to adjudicating the omitted ground.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:50:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930755" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (4) TMI 1495 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472632</link>
      <description>Non-adjudication of a ground challenging partial disallowance of business expenses, despite its inclusion in Form No. 36, constitutes a mistake apparent from the record. A discrepancy between the serial numbering in Form No. 36 and separately annexed grounds does not negate that the ground was duly raised. Rectification is therefore available through limited recall confined to adjudicating the omitted ground.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472632</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>