<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Input tax credit claims require transaction-specific proof of goods receipt; restored supplier registration supports entitlement despite bogus-supplier allegations.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105166</link>
    <description>Input tax credit on purchases from an allegedly bogus supplier was allowed where the recipient produced purchase, transportation and goods-receipt records. Entitlement required examination of statutory conditions and transaction-specific evidence, rather than reliance solely on allegations against the supplier. Restoration of the supplier&#039;s registration also undermined the claim that it was bogus or non-existent. Documents submitted as additional evidence did not prejudice the adjudicating authority because they were forwarded for examination and its report was considered. The procedural objection was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal against allowance of input tax credit was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Input tax credit claims require transaction-specific proof of goods receipt; restored supplier registration supports entitlement despite bogus-supplier allegations.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105166</link>
      <description>Input tax credit on purchases from an allegedly bogus supplier was allowed where the recipient produced purchase, transportation and goods-receipt records. Entitlement required examination of statutory conditions and transaction-specific evidence, rather than reliance solely on allegations against the supplier. Restoration of the supplier&#039;s registration also undermined the claim that it was bogus or non-existent. Documents submitted as additional evidence did not prejudice the adjudicating authority because they were forwarded for examination and its report was considered. The procedural objection was rejected, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal against allowance of input tax credit was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105166</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>