<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Construction Cost Evidence for Flat Sales Requires Capital-Gains Recalculation While Reassessment Remains Valid After Proper Notice</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105144</link>
    <description>Capital-gains computation for a constructed flat sold with an undivided land share must consider credible evidence of both land and construction cost. A registered conveyance is not necessarily conclusive where contemporaneous agreements and housing-finance disbursement, repayment and closure records substantiate construction expenditure. The capital-gains addition was deleted, with recomputation required after allowing the substantiated construction cost and applicable indexation. Reassessment based on property-sale information and non-filing of a return was sustained after notice and prescribed procedure. The unexplained-payment issue involving non-residents remained for determination because the available record lacked transaction details and supporting evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Construction Cost Evidence for Flat Sales Requires Capital-Gains Recalculation While Reassessment Remains Valid After Proper Notice</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105144</link>
      <description>Capital-gains computation for a constructed flat sold with an undivided land share must consider credible evidence of both land and construction cost. A registered conveyance is not necessarily conclusive where contemporaneous agreements and housing-finance disbursement, repayment and closure records substantiate construction expenditure. The capital-gains addition was deleted, with recomputation required after allowing the substantiated construction cost and applicable indexation. Reassessment based on property-sale information and non-filing of a return was sustained after notice and prescribed procedure. The unexplained-payment issue involving non-residents remained for determination because the available record lacked transaction details and supporting evidence.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>