<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>PMLA attachment preservation allows housing redevelopment while replacement flat and all related accruals remain subject to attachment.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105137</link>
    <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not prevent a co-operative housing society from redeveloping its building where the attached flat&#039;s replacement remained subject to attachment. The attachment had to be disclosed in redevelopment documents, and all accruals relating to the attached flat had to be deposited exclusively in the designated Enforcement Directorate account. The replacement flat was entitled to the same redevelopment benefits as other members. A bank guarantee was not required because it would impose financial pressure before redevelopment terms were finalised. Redevelopment was permitted subject to these safeguards.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930640" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>PMLA attachment preservation allows housing redevelopment while replacement flat and all related accruals remain subject to attachment.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105137</link>
      <description>Attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act did not prevent a co-operative housing society from redeveloping its building where the attached flat&#039;s replacement remained subject to attachment. The attachment had to be disclosed in redevelopment documents, and all accruals relating to the attached flat had to be deposited exclusively in the designated Enforcement Directorate account. The replacement flat was entitled to the same redevelopment benefits as other members. A bank guarantee was not required because it would impose financial pressure before redevelopment terms were finalised. Redevelopment was permitted subject to these safeguards.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 07:01:13 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>