<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (5) TMI 1872 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472628</link>
    <description>Sales-tax remission under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme, 1993 is characterised under the purpose test by the object of the subsidy rather than its mode of disbursement. Where remission is designed to induce fresh fixed-capital investment and support expansion and modernisation of industrial units in backward areas, rather than assist trading operations or profitability, it constitutes a capital receipt rather than a revenue receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 18:37:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930616" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (5) TMI 1872 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472628</link>
      <description>Sales-tax remission under the West Bengal Incentive Scheme, 1993 is characterised under the purpose test by the object of the subsidy rather than its mode of disbursement. Where remission is designed to induce fresh fixed-capital investment and support expansion and modernisation of industrial units in backward areas, rather than assist trading operations or profitability, it constitutes a capital receipt rather than a revenue receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472628</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>