<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 159 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54583</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for re-examination, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity to present evidence and ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s argument that the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate was sufficient was considered valid, leading to a directive for re-examination with the inclusion of additional evidence if necessary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 10:03:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 159 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54583</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case to the original authority for re-examination, emphasizing the need for a fair opportunity to present evidence and ensuring compliance with the principles of natural justice. The appellant&#039;s argument that the Chartered Accountant&#039;s certificate was sufficient was considered valid, leading to a directive for re-examination with the inclusion of additional evidence if necessary.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54583</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>