<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (11) TMI 895 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472607</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC requires assessment of allegation gravity, absconding risk, interference with investigation, cooperation, and the necessity of custodial interrogation. Allegations of overridden objections, unauthorised advances, altered contractual terms favouring private parties, and resulting cooperative-society losses supported investigation into the alleged nexus and tracing of funds. Civil recovery or arbitration proceedings did not prima facie rule out criminal liability, and a detailed examination of alleged offence ingredients was unnecessary at the bail stage. Custodial interrogation was considered necessary for an effective investigation, precluding anticipatory bail.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 10:31:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930596" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (11) TMI 895 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472607</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail under section 438 CrPC requires assessment of allegation gravity, absconding risk, interference with investigation, cooperation, and the necessity of custodial interrogation. Allegations of overridden objections, unauthorised advances, altered contractual terms favouring private parties, and resulting cooperative-society losses supported investigation into the alleged nexus and tracing of funds. Civil recovery or arbitration proceedings did not prima facie rule out criminal liability, and a detailed examination of alleged offence ingredients was unnecessary at the bail stage. Custodial interrogation was considered necessary for an effective investigation, precluding anticipatory bail.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472607</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>