<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1162 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801219</link>
    <description>AT-1 bond write-downs triggered by a bank&#039;s point of non-viability must be effected before a reconstruction scheme takes effect, through the authority and procedure prescribed by the applicable regulatory framework. A general provision preserving existing instruments or an Administrator&#039;s board-management powers does not confer the banking regulator&#039;s distinct power to order a write-down or conversion. Omission of a specific write-down clause from the final reconstruction scheme indicates that the scheme did not authorise alteration of the bonds. The post-reconstruction permanent write-down was therefore ultra vires and invalid, and annual coupon obligations continue under the applicable Information Memoranda.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930588" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1162 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801219</link>
      <description>AT-1 bond write-downs triggered by a bank&#039;s point of non-viability must be effected before a reconstruction scheme takes effect, through the authority and procedure prescribed by the applicable regulatory framework. A general provision preserving existing instruments or an Administrator&#039;s board-management powers does not confer the banking regulator&#039;s distinct power to order a write-down or conversion. Omission of a specific write-down clause from the final reconstruction scheme indicates that the scheme did not authorise alteration of the bonds. The post-reconstruction permanent write-down was therefore ultra vires and invalid, and annual coupon obligations continue under the applicable Information Memoranda.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>