<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1169 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801226</link>
    <description>Applicability of the statutory excise-duty refund and interest regime to voluntary or involuntary deposits, including payments made under mistake or during investigation, remains contested. Conflicting Tribunal views concern both the applicable interest rate and the date from which interest becomes payable. These issues were referred for constitution of a still larger Bench, with no final determination of entitlement, rate, or commencement of interest.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930581" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1169 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801226</link>
      <description>Applicability of the statutory excise-duty refund and interest regime to voluntary or involuntary deposits, including payments made under mistake or during investigation, remains contested. Conflicting Tribunal views concern both the applicable interest rate and the date from which interest becomes payable. These issues were referred for constitution of a still larger Bench, with no final determination of entitlement, rate, or commencement of interest.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801226</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>