<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 119 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54579</link>
    <description>Exemption under Notification No. 115/86-CE was available only on strict compliance with its prescribed conditions, including maintaining the required charge-wise account and exercising the specified option for computing exemption. Because those conditions were not met, refund was not available. A refund claim was also not maintainable where duty had been paid on the basis of an approved classification list that had never been challenged, since the basis of payment itself remained undisturbed. The sanctioned refund was therefore recoverable, and the appeal failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:56:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 119 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54579</link>
      <description>Exemption under Notification No. 115/86-CE was available only on strict compliance with its prescribed conditions, including maintaining the required charge-wise account and exercising the specified option for computing exemption. Because those conditions were not met, refund was not available. A refund claim was also not maintainable where duty had been paid on the basis of an approved classification list that had never been challenged, since the basis of payment itself remained undisturbed. The sanctioned refund was therefore recoverable, and the appeal failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>