<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1202 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801259</link>
    <description>Request-specific road restoration performed by a public works department for a business pipeline network constitutes a taxable supply where charges reflect reciprocal restoration work, rather than compensation for breach or damage. Routine road maintenance as a public function does not extend non-supply or exemption treatment to customised services supplied to a business entity. Under reverse charge, the recipient bears GST liability for taxable government services; an unsubstantiated double-taxation plea or refund sanction granted to other State registrations does not establish refund entitlement. Electronically authenticated GST proceedings remain valid where the notice states the factual and legal basis, the recipient responds substantively, and no prejudice arises from absence of a physical DIN.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1202 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801259</link>
      <description>Request-specific road restoration performed by a public works department for a business pipeline network constitutes a taxable supply where charges reflect reciprocal restoration work, rather than compensation for breach or damage. Routine road maintenance as a public function does not extend non-supply or exemption treatment to customised services supplied to a business entity. Under reverse charge, the recipient bears GST liability for taxable government services; an unsubstantiated double-taxation plea or refund sanction granted to other State registrations does not establish refund entitlement. Electronically authenticated GST proceedings remain valid where the notice states the factual and legal basis, the recipient responds substantively, and no prejudice arises from absence of a physical DIN.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>