<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1204 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801261</link>
    <description>Commercial, request-driven restoration of road damage caused by business pipeline cutting constitutes a taxable supply when a government authority performs it for calculated charges. It is distinguishable from routine public-road maintenance and does not qualify as a sovereign non-supply function or an exemption relating to local-government functions; GST paid under reverse charge is therefore not refundable. Refund orders issued in other jurisdictions neither bind an independent determination nor override statutory conditions. An unsubstantiated allegation of prior forward-charge payment does not displace reverse-charge liability. Refund proceedings remain valid where the notice adequately states the basis for denial and electronic portal authentication establishes the notice and order&#039;s identity and integrity despite no physical document identification number.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930546" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1204 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801261</link>
      <description>Commercial, request-driven restoration of road damage caused by business pipeline cutting constitutes a taxable supply when a government authority performs it for calculated charges. It is distinguishable from routine public-road maintenance and does not qualify as a sovereign non-supply function or an exemption relating to local-government functions; GST paid under reverse charge is therefore not refundable. Refund orders issued in other jurisdictions neither bind an independent determination nor override statutory conditions. An unsubstantiated allegation of prior forward-charge payment does not displace reverse-charge liability. Refund proceedings remain valid where the notice adequately states the basis for denial and electronic portal authentication establishes the notice and order&#039;s identity and integrity despite no physical document identification number.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801261</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>