<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 156 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54570</link>
    <description>Body-built motor vehicles with seating capacity exceeding 12 persons excluding the driver were held to fall under sub-heading 8702.90, because that tariff entry covers vehicles of that capacity and the chassis supplied had been classified under sub-heading 8706.29, which itself pointed to motor vehicles of sub-heading 8702.90. On that basis, classification under sub-heading 8702.10 was not warranted. The same classification analysis also meant National Calamity Contingent Duty was not attracted, so no NCCD was payable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:54:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93047" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 156 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54570</link>
      <description>Body-built motor vehicles with seating capacity exceeding 12 persons excluding the driver were held to fall under sub-heading 8702.90, because that tariff entry covers vehicles of that capacity and the chassis supplied had been classified under sub-heading 8706.29, which itself pointed to motor vehicles of sub-heading 8702.90. On that basis, classification under sub-heading 8702.10 was not warranted. The same classification analysis also meant National Calamity Contingent Duty was not attracted, so no NCCD was payable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54570</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>