<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Administrative write-down authority cannot be implied after a reconstruction scheme omits specific AT-1 bond powers.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105092</link>
    <description>Judicial review of the administrative write-down must assess legality against the facts and law existing when it occurred; subsequent financial developments cannot alter that inquiry. Omission from the final Reconstruction Scheme of an express AT-1 bond write-down provision meant that a general savings clause could not imply authority for the Administrator to alter the bonds. The Master Circular required conversion or write-down before the Scheme took effect, and the power at the point of non-viability lay with RBI rather than an Administrator exercising board powers. The post-scheme write-down was therefore ultra vires, was set aside, and coupon payments remained governed by the Information Memoranda.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Administrative write-down authority cannot be implied after a reconstruction scheme omits specific AT-1 bond powers.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105092</link>
      <description>Judicial review of the administrative write-down must assess legality against the facts and law existing when it occurred; subsequent financial developments cannot alter that inquiry. Omission from the final Reconstruction Scheme of an express AT-1 bond write-down provision meant that a general savings clause could not imply authority for the Administrator to alter the bonds. The Master Circular required conversion or write-down before the Scheme took effect, and the power at the point of non-viability lay with RBI rather than an Administrator exercising board powers. The post-scheme write-down was therefore ultra vires, was set aside, and coupon payments remained governed by the Information Memoranda.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2026 05:20:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105092</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>