<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (4) TMI 2299 - ITAT AGRA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472594</link>
    <description>Cash-deposit addition in an income-tax assessment required consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s explanation that deposits arose from prior withdrawals and past savings. The explanation was partially substantiated, and an allowance for past savings was considered warranted. The addition was consequently restricted to the supported extent, while the remaining balance was deleted in full.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 18:43:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930455" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (4) TMI 2299 - ITAT AGRA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472594</link>
      <description>Cash-deposit addition in an income-tax assessment required consideration of the taxpayer&#039;s explanation that deposits arose from prior withdrawals and past savings. The explanation was partially substantiated, and an allowance for past savings was considered warranted. The addition was consequently restricted to the supported extent, while the remaining balance was deleted in full.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472594</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>