<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (9) TMI 155 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54566</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with exemption conditions, the rationale for penalty imposition, and the obligation to pay interest on deferred duty payment as per the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93043" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (9) TMI 155 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54566</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, setting aside the penalty imposed on the appellants. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with exemption conditions, the rationale for penalty imposition, and the obligation to pay interest on deferred duty payment as per the Central Excise Act, 1944.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54566</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>