https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472576 Statutory appellate remedy was treated as the appropriate route where input tax credit disputes required determination of contested facts. Writ jurisdiction was not exercised because the available appeal provided an efficacious remedy and allegations concerning denial of an effective hearing were not finally adjudicated. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal, with any request to exclude time for limitation purposes to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law. en-us Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2026 13:19:07 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472576 Statutory appellate remedy was treated as the appropriate route where input tax credit disputes required determination of contested facts. Writ jurisdiction was not exercised because the available appeal provided an efficacious remedy and allegations concerning denial of an effective hearing were not finally adjudicated. The petitioner was directed to pursue the statutory appeal, with any request to exclude time for limitation purposes to be considered by the appellate authority in accordance with law. Case-Laws GST Mon, 20 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472576