<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 246 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54561</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed interest without determining duty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal held that imposing interest under Section 11AB was unjustified as demands were not determined under Section 11A(2). The appellant successfully argued that interest should not be levied without first establishing duty. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s challenge was upheld, and any consequential relief was ordered to follow.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 18:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93038" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 246 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54561</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order that confirmed interest without determining duty under the Central Excise Act. The Tribunal held that imposing interest under Section 11AB was unjustified as demands were not determined under Section 11A(2). The appellant successfully argued that interest should not be levied without first establishing duty. Consequently, the appellant&#039;s challenge was upheld, and any consequential relief was ordered to follow.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54561</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>