<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1069 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801126</link>
    <description>Sales-tax demand notice dated 15 July 1997 for assessment year 1991-92 fell within the five-year limitation under Section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. An earlier notice concerning the same assessment year and sales-tax demand had been issued within the prescribed period. The later notice was treated as a continuation of the earlier timely notice, rather than as an independent and time-barred demand, and was therefore valid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930372" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1069 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801126</link>
      <description>Sales-tax demand notice dated 15 July 1997 for assessment year 1991-92 fell within the five-year limitation under Section 12 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1994. An earlier notice concerning the same assessment year and sales-tax demand had been issued within the prescribed period. The later notice was treated as a continuation of the earlier timely notice, rather than as an independent and time-barred demand, and was therefore valid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>