https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801137 Unauthorised foreign-exchange contraventions require proof that seized currency represents proceeds of prohibited transactions. A documented cash withdrawal and cash-book entries may explain possession of currency, while failure to prove seizure undermines reliance on recovered cash. Presumptions for seized documents apply only after independent admissibility is established; loose sheets that are not books of account cannot be validated by statutory presumption. A retracted statement requires proof of voluntariness and corroborative material. Burden shifting applies only once the Department proves the foundational act requiring permission. These evidentiary requirements prevent proof of contravention through unproved seizures, inadmissible records, or uncorroborated statements. en-us Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801137 Unauthorised foreign-exchange contraventions require proof that seized currency represents proceeds of prohibited transactions. A documented cash withdrawal and cash-book entries may explain possession of currency, while failure to prove seizure undermines reliance on recovered cash. Presumptions for seized documents apply only after independent admissibility is established; loose sheets that are not books of account cannot be validated by statutory presumption. A retracted statement requires proof of voluntariness and corroborative material. Burden shifting applies only once the Department proves the foundational act requiring permission. These evidentiary requirements prevent proof of contravention through unproved seizures, inadmissible records, or uncorroborated statements. Case-Laws FEMA Wed, 14 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801137