<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1081 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801138</link>
    <description>Suspended directors who are personal guarantors and unsuccessful resolution applicants may challenge resolution-plan approval under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. E-bidding terms may prevent unilateral post-closure bid revisions, while the Committee of Creditors may seek clarifications and permit compliance-related modifications without reopening financial bidding. Approved plans are not displaced unless statutory non-compliance or material irregularity is established; commercial decisions on negotiations, viability and compliant valuations ordinarily remain within the Committee&#039;s domain. Valuations conducted through the prescribed process, continuation of a retained resolution professional, and optional special-purpose-company structures do not by themselves invalidate a plan. A consortium must retain majority shareholding during implementation, and acceptance of a declined one-time settlement cannot be compelled after plan approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1081 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801138</link>
      <description>Suspended directors who are personal guarantors and unsuccessful resolution applicants may challenge resolution-plan approval under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. E-bidding terms may prevent unilateral post-closure bid revisions, while the Committee of Creditors may seek clarifications and permit compliance-related modifications without reopening financial bidding. Approved plans are not displaced unless statutory non-compliance or material irregularity is established; commercial decisions on negotiations, viability and compliant valuations ordinarily remain within the Committee&#039;s domain. Valuations conducted through the prescribed process, continuation of a retained resolution professional, and optional special-purpose-company structures do not by themselves invalidate a plan. A consortium must retain majority shareholding during implementation, and acceptance of a declined one-time settlement cannot be compelled after plan approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>