<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1126 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801183</link>
    <description>Challenges to the legality, validity and propriety of a reassessment notice, including the statutory sanction for its issuance, were left open after connected reassessment matters were remanded. The petition was closed with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings on the same cause of action, including a challenge to the newly introduced statutory provision. Existing protection continued for 90 days but would cease if no fresh petition was filed within that period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1126 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801183</link>
      <description>Challenges to the legality, validity and propriety of a reassessment notice, including the statutory sanction for its issuance, were left open after connected reassessment matters were remanded. The petition was closed with liberty to initiate fresh proceedings on the same cause of action, including a challenge to the newly introduced statutory provision. Existing protection continued for 90 days but would cease if no fresh petition was filed within that period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>