<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1136 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801193</link>
    <description>Customised road-restoration services performed by a government authority at a business entity&#039;s request, following road excavation for pipeline operations, constitute a taxable supply for consideration rather than compensatory damages. Targeted commercial restoration differs from general public-road maintenance and does not qualify as a non-supply governmental function or a public-function exemption. The business recipient bears GST under reverse charge. Refund orders from other jurisdictions do not establish binding precedent or res judicata, and unproven forward-charge payment does not displace reverse-charge liability. Electronically authenticated GST proceedings remain valid where the notice identifies the grounds, the recipient can respond, and no prejudice arises from the absence of a physical DIN.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930305" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1136 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801193</link>
      <description>Customised road-restoration services performed by a government authority at a business entity&#039;s request, following road excavation for pipeline operations, constitute a taxable supply for consideration rather than compensatory damages. Targeted commercial restoration differs from general public-road maintenance and does not qualify as a non-supply governmental function or a public-function exemption. The business recipient bears GST under reverse charge. Refund orders from other jurisdictions do not establish binding precedent or res judicata, and unproven forward-charge payment does not displace reverse-charge liability. Electronically authenticated GST proceedings remain valid where the notice identifies the grounds, the recipient can respond, and no prejudice arises from the absence of a physical DIN.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801193</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>