<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1137 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801194</link>
    <description>Targeted restoration of public roads at a business entity&#039;s request is treated as a taxable supply for consideration rather than compensatory damages or a sovereign public-road function. Recipient liability therefore arises under the applicable reverse-charge mechanism, while exclusions and exemptions are construed strictly. Refund sanctions by tax officers in other State jurisdictions are administrative determinations, not binding precedents or res judicata. Electronic GST-portal proceedings remain valid where notices identify the factual and legal basis of the claim and the taxpayer suffers no prejudice; absence of a physical Document Identification Number alone does not compromise authenticity or natural justice. These principles support denial of refund where reverse-charge tax remains unpaid.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1137 - GSTAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801194</link>
      <description>Targeted restoration of public roads at a business entity&#039;s request is treated as a taxable supply for consideration rather than compensatory damages or a sovereign public-road function. Recipient liability therefore arises under the applicable reverse-charge mechanism, while exclusions and exemptions are construed strictly. Refund sanctions by tax officers in other State jurisdictions are administrative determinations, not binding precedents or res judicata. Electronic GST-portal proceedings remain valid where notices identify the factual and legal basis of the claim and the taxpayer suffers no prejudice; absence of a physical Document Identification Number alone does not compromise authenticity or natural justice. These principles support denial of refund where reverse-charge tax remains unpaid.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>