<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 225 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54553</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed all appeals in a case involving the rejection of transaction value in favor of contemporaneous value for imported goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of &#039;special circumstances&#039; under Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 and upheld the appellants&#039; argument that the transaction value was based on commercial considerations. It highlighted the necessity for Customs to accept the price actually paid or payable unless specific exceptions apply, distinguishing previous cases under different legal provisions. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellants based on the correct interpretation of the rules.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 17:12:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93030" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 225 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54553</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Bangalore, allowed all appeals in a case involving the rejection of transaction value in favor of contemporaneous value for imported goods. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of &#039;special circumstances&#039; under Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 and upheld the appellants&#039; argument that the transaction value was based on commercial considerations. It highlighted the necessity for Customs to accept the price actually paid or payable unless specific exceptions apply, distinguishing previous cases under different legal provisions. The decision provided consequential relief to the appellants based on the correct interpretation of the rules.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54553</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>