<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801206</link>
    <description>Ex parte assessment under Section 73 should be reopened where the taxpayer can substantiate an input tax credit claim through portal records and supporting documents, despite earlier non-utilisation of opportunities. The absence of any stated discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A supported allowing a fresh reply before the assessing officer. Reconsideration is subject to deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount, after which the assessment must be undertaken afresh.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1149 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801206</link>
      <description>Ex parte assessment under Section 73 should be reopened where the taxpayer can substantiate an input tax credit claim through portal records and supporting documents, despite earlier non-utilisation of opportunities. The absence of any stated discrepancy between GSTR-3B and GSTR-2A supported allowing a fresh reply before the assessing officer. Reconsideration is subject to deposit of 25% of the disputed tax amount, after which the assessment must be undertaken afresh.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801206</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>