<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revision for inadequate enquiry may stand where assessment fails to test present liability against future obligation.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105080</link>
    <description>Revisionary jurisdiction requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue and cannot merely replace one plausible view with another. Deduction for contributions to a Core Settlement Guarantee Fund required enquiry into whether payment created an accrued business liability or constituted a corpus for potential future defaults. Examination of genuineness and reasonableness alone was insufficient, given the fund&#039;s segregation, accumulated corpus and interest income. The ITAT sustained limited revision because the Assessing Officer had not undertaken requisite verification, directing fresh examination after hearing the assessee while leaving deductibility open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revision for inadequate enquiry may stand where assessment fails to test present liability against future obligation.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105080</link>
      <description>Revisionary jurisdiction requires an assessment order to be both erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue and cannot merely replace one plausible view with another. Deduction for contributions to a Core Settlement Guarantee Fund required enquiry into whether payment created an accrued business liability or constituted a corpus for potential future defaults. Examination of genuineness and reasonableness alone was insufficient, given the fund&#039;s segregation, accumulated corpus and interest income. The ITAT sustained limited revision because the Assessing Officer had not undertaken requisite verification, directing fresh examination after hearing the assessee while leaving deductibility open.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>