<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Anti-profiteering obligations survive business demerger, complaint withdrawal, and customized supply arrangements where rate-reduction benefits are not passed on.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105069</link>
    <description>Anti-profiteering liability following a GST rate reduction may apply despite a business demerger and a post-reduction registration where transactional evidence establishes the supplier&#039;s nexus to affected supplies. Investigation may extend beyond the original complaint and continue after its withdrawal because the regime serves consumer welfare. For customised lump-sum supplies, invoice-wise base-price comparison is permissible if rational, evidence-based and reconciled; the computation was accepted. Wilful retention need not be proved, although non-passing of the benefit must be established. The supplier was found to have breached the pass-through obligation and was subject to restitution and deposit directions; no penalty applied because the penal provision operated only prospectively.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930263" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Anti-profiteering obligations survive business demerger, complaint withdrawal, and customized supply arrangements where rate-reduction benefits are not passed on.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105069</link>
      <description>Anti-profiteering liability following a GST rate reduction may apply despite a business demerger and a post-reduction registration where transactional evidence establishes the supplier&#039;s nexus to affected supplies. Investigation may extend beyond the original complaint and continue after its withdrawal because the regime serves consumer welfare. For customised lump-sum supplies, invoice-wise base-price comparison is permissible if rational, evidence-based and reconciled; the computation was accepted. Wilful retention need not be proved, although non-passing of the benefit must be established. The supplier was found to have breached the pass-through obligation and was subject to restitution and deposit directions; no penalty applied because the penal provision operated only prospectively.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 05:20:55 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=105069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>