<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1775 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472552</link>
    <description>Section 45 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act imposes twin conditions for bail, but their application must remain consistent with Article 21 protections of personal liberty and speedy trial. Where charges remain unframed and completion of extensive money-laundering and predicate-offence trials is not reasonably foreseeable, prolonged pre-trial detention cannot become punitive or indefinite. Compliance with bail conditions in the predicate case, the availability of stringent safeguards, and parity with similarly placed co-accused support satisfaction of the statutory conditions. Parity does not require an applicant to undergo the same duration of custody as co-accused before conditional bail may be granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1775 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472552</link>
      <description>Section 45 of the Prevention of Money-laundering Act imposes twin conditions for bail, but their application must remain consistent with Article 21 protections of personal liberty and speedy trial. Where charges remain unframed and completion of extensive money-laundering and predicate-offence trials is not reasonably foreseeable, prolonged pre-trial detention cannot become punitive or indefinite. Compliance with bail conditions in the predicate case, the availability of stringent safeguards, and parity with similarly placed co-accused support satisfaction of the statutory conditions. Parity does not require an applicant to undergo the same duration of custody as co-accused before conditional bail may be granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472552</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>