<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (2) TMI 1492 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472560</link>
    <description>Section 68 requires proof of the contributor&#039;s identity, transaction genuineness and creditworthiness. Partner capital contributions represent ownership interests rather than borrowings, and the additional source-of-source requirement applicable to specified share-capital credits of closely held companies does not extend to partnership firms. Where identified partners confirm and own their contributions, supported by affidavits, financial records and banking-channel remittances, doubts about the ultimate source in their foreign bank accounts are relevant to their individual assessments, not the firm&#039;s income. Reliance on an undisclosed remand report without an opportunity to rebut it conflicts with natural justice; further verification is unnecessary absent material that the firm&#039;s undisclosed income was routed through partners.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930215" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (2) TMI 1492 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472560</link>
      <description>Section 68 requires proof of the contributor&#039;s identity, transaction genuineness and creditworthiness. Partner capital contributions represent ownership interests rather than borrowings, and the additional source-of-source requirement applicable to specified share-capital credits of closely held companies does not extend to partnership firms. Where identified partners confirm and own their contributions, supported by affidavits, financial records and banking-channel remittances, doubts about the ultimate source in their foreign bank accounts are relevant to their individual assessments, not the firm&#039;s income. Reliance on an undisclosed remand report without an opportunity to rebut it conflicts with natural justice; further verification is unnecessary absent material that the firm&#039;s undisclosed income was routed through partners.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472560</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>