<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1490 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472565</link>
    <description>Reassessment was challenged on grounds of change of opinion, absence of fresh tangible material, and impermissible review by the Assessing Officer. Following the subsequent assessment order and dismissal of the first appellate challenge, the writ petition was dismissed because a further appeal was pending before the Tribunal. All grounds available in law, including the challenge to reopening, remained open for consideration in the pending appellate proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 19:04:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1490 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472565</link>
      <description>Reassessment was challenged on grounds of change of opinion, absence of fresh tangible material, and impermissible review by the Assessing Officer. Following the subsequent assessment order and dismissal of the first appellate challenge, the writ petition was dismissed because a further appeal was pending before the Tribunal. All grounds available in law, including the challenge to reopening, remained open for consideration in the pending appellate proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472565</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>