<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (8) TMI 1153 - SC Order (LB)</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472546</link>
    <description>Civil appeals concerning central excise were dismissed after delay was condoned. No substantive legal reasoning, disputed legal question, statutory interpretation, or central excise principle is specified. The operative effect is limited to condonation of delay and dismissal of the appeals, without any stated general legal rule or clarification applicable beyond the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 17:25:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (8) TMI 1153 - SC Order (LB)</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472546</link>
      <description>Civil appeals concerning central excise were dismissed after delay was condoned. No substantive legal reasoning, disputed legal question, statutory interpretation, or central excise principle is specified. The operative effect is limited to condonation of delay and dismissal of the appeals, without any stated general legal rule or clarification applicable beyond the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472546</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>