<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (7) TMI 1831 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472539</link>
    <description>Provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(2) ceases to operate once the statutory one-year period from the attachment order expires. Expiry of that period causes the attachment to lapse, requiring the bank account to be de-frozen. The respondents accepted that the attachment had expired under the statutory time limit and no continued restraint could be maintained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 13:05:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930164" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (7) TMI 1831 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472539</link>
      <description>Provisional attachment of a bank account under Section 83(2) ceases to operate once the statutory one-year period from the attachment order expires. Expiry of that period causes the attachment to lapse, requiring the bank account to be de-frozen. The respondents accepted that the attachment had expired under the statutory time limit and no continued restraint could be maintained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472539</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>