<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (8) TMI 220 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54536</link>
    <description>For the period before Rule 6 introduced reversal at 8% of the value of exempted goods, an assessee using common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods was required to reverse only the actual credit taken on those inputs. The Board circular governing that period supported reversal only to the extent of credit availed, and the later rule could not be applied retrospectively. As no machinery existed in that earlier period to demand the higher amount, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the finding on actual-credit reversal was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:23:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93013" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (8) TMI 220 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54536</link>
      <description>For the period before Rule 6 introduced reversal at 8% of the value of exempted goods, an assessee using common inputs for dutiable and exempted goods was required to reverse only the actual credit taken on those inputs. The Board circular governing that period supported reversal only to the extent of credit availed, and the later rule could not be applied retrospectively. As no machinery existed in that earlier period to demand the higher amount, the Revenue&#039;s challenge failed and the finding on actual-credit reversal was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54536</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>