https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54534 The Tribunal found that the charge of clandestine removal of goods was not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the penalty being set aside. However, the order of confiscation of seized goods and the duty demand were upheld. The appeal was disposed of with the penalty being overturned due to lack of evidence, while the confiscation and duty demand were maintained. en-us Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 20 Oct 2010 16:13:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54534 The Tribunal found that the charge of clandestine removal of goods was not supported by sufficient evidence, leading to the penalty being set aside. However, the order of confiscation of seized goods and the duty demand were upheld. The appeal was disposed of with the penalty being overturned due to lack of evidence, while the confiscation and duty demand were maintained. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 27 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54534