https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801116 Statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act was available against the impugned order, making appellate review the appropriate route for objections to overlapping demands. The Appellate Authority could examine those objections and consider any legally permissible exemption from pre-deposit. Challenges to the relevant notifications remained pending before the Supreme Court and were not decided. Restoration of the writ petition was refused, while preserving the right to file a statutory appeal within the stipulated period. en-us Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:44:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801116 Statutory appellate remedy under the CGST Act was available against the impugned order, making appellate review the appropriate route for objections to overlapping demands. The Appellate Authority could examine those objections and consider any legally permissible exemption from pre-deposit. Challenges to the relevant notifications remained pending before the Supreme Court and were not decided. Restoration of the writ petition was refused, while preserving the right to file a statutory appeal within the stipulated period. Case-Laws GST Thu, 08 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801116