<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (10) TMI 1062 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801119</link>
    <description>Anticipatory bail was considered unwarranted in allegations of misappropriating funds entrusted for GST payments and furnishing fabricated GST payment forms. Substantial sums allegedly received for payment were not deposited through the GST portal, while fabricated documents were allegedly used to represent that payment had been made. The seriousness of the alleged financial misconduct weighed against granting pre-arrest protection.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=930036" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (10) TMI 1062 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801119</link>
      <description>Anticipatory bail was considered unwarranted in allegations of misappropriating funds entrusted for GST payments and furnishing fabricated GST payment forms. Substantial sums allegedly received for payment were not deposited through the GST portal, while fabricated documents were allegedly used to represent that payment had been made. The seriousness of the alleged financial misconduct weighed against granting pre-arrest protection.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=801119</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>