<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 232 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54526</link>
    <description>The appellants appealed against the denial of interest on late payment of pre-deposit. The Vice-President ruled in favor of the appellants, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents, and granted them interest on the refunded amount from three months after the final order till the date of payment. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants, entitling them to the interest on the refunded amount for the relevant period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:55:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93003" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 232 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54526</link>
      <description>The appellants appealed against the denial of interest on late payment of pre-deposit. The Vice-President ruled in favor of the appellants, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents, and granted them interest on the refunded amount from three months after the final order till the date of payment. The appeals were disposed of in favor of the appellants, entitling them to the interest on the refunded amount for the relevant period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>