<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (6) TMI 185 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54524</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s majority decision allowed the appeal, determining that the transaction value declared by the appellants for the imported goods should be accepted for customs duty assessment. The Tribunal found no special circumstances under Rule 4(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, to warrant rejection of the transaction value. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the declared transaction value was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2024 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=93001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (6) TMI 185 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54524</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s majority decision allowed the appeal, determining that the transaction value declared by the appellants for the imported goods should be accepted for customs duty assessment. The Tribunal found no special circumstances under Rule 4(2) of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988, to warrant rejection of the transaction value. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the declared transaction value was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54524</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>