<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Accrued unpaid profit-sharing liability remains deductible when obligation has crystallised despite insufficient funds at year-end</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104989</link>
    <description>Under the mercantile system, an accrued but unpaid obligation to share overflow profit with investors remains deductible where its nature and accrual are undisputed. Lack of funds at the close of the previous year does not by itself make the liability contingent. The obligation arose under the investor arrangement, had neither ceased nor failed to accrue, and was outside payment-based liabilities governed by section 43B. Its subsequent discharge further supported the conclusion that it was not contingent. Accordingly, disallowance of the accrued outstanding liability was unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:44:05 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:44:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=929992" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Accrued unpaid profit-sharing liability remains deductible when obligation has crystallised despite insufficient funds at year-end</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104989</link>
      <description>Under the mercantile system, an accrued but unpaid obligation to share overflow profit with investors remains deductible where its nature and accrual are undisputed. Lack of funds at the close of the previous year does not by itself make the liability contingent. The obligation arose under the investor arrangement, had neither ceased nor failed to accrue, and was outside payment-based liabilities governed by section 43B. Its subsequent discharge further supported the conclusion that it was not contingent. Accordingly, disallowance of the accrued outstanding liability was unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2026 05:44:05 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=104989</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>