https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472522 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may remain available despite an appeal against an interlocutory injunction where the challenge is confined to the trial court's foundational lack of jurisdiction, rather than disputed facts or injunctive merits. After a liquidation order, Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code restricts suits or legal proceedings by or against a corporate debtor, subject to the liquidator's approved proceedings. Section 63 further excludes civil-court jurisdiction over matters assigned to NCLT or NCLAT. Where the statutory bar is apparent, Order VII Rule 11 may be applied suo motu; any interim injunction issued without jurisdiction is a nullity. en-us Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 14 Oct 2026 18:57:53 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472522 Supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 may remain available despite an appeal against an interlocutory injunction where the challenge is confined to the trial court's foundational lack of jurisdiction, rather than disputed facts or injunctive merits. After a liquidation order, Section 33(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code restricts suits or legal proceedings by or against a corporate debtor, subject to the liquidator's approved proceedings. Section 63 further excludes civil-court jurisdiction over matters assigned to NCLT or NCLAT. Where the statutory bar is apparent, Order VII Rule 11 may be applied suo motu; any interim injunction issued without jurisdiction is a nullity. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=472522