<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 231 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54513</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal upholding duty demand and penalty against the appellants for an alleged shortage of footwear stock due to lack of proper verification and documentation. The officers failed to disclose crucial details of the stock checking process and did not prepare a panchnama at the spot. Despite the appellants&#039; denial of shortages and improper verification, the Department did not conduct on-site verification. Without concrete evidence, the Tribunal found the case unsustainable, leading to the appeal&#039;s success with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Oct 2010 14:00:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=92990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 231 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54513</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the Order-in-Appeal upholding duty demand and penalty against the appellants for an alleged shortage of footwear stock due to lack of proper verification and documentation. The officers failed to disclose crucial details of the stock checking process and did not prepare a panchnama at the spot. Despite the appellants&#039; denial of shortages and improper verification, the Department did not conduct on-site verification. Without concrete evidence, the Tribunal found the case unsustainable, leading to the appeal&#039;s success with consequential relief granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=54513</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>